jurispraxis.ai
Sign up

Legal AI for every lawyer

Every lawyer deserves the best AI there is.

jurispraxis.ai researches the case law and the statute of your country, writes the document from what it found, and keeps the whole matter in one place. Every point rests on a quotation you can open.

Sign up free See how it works

Only what the court actually wrote.

Who it is for

For anyone who has to show their sources.

  1. 01

    Litigators

    A brief with citations that hold, in a fraction of the search time. And the other side’s line of authority in view before the hearing.

  2. 02

    In-house counsel

    A substantiated answer for the board, with the judgment attached instead of ‘in my estimation’.

  3. 03

    Legal support staff

    A first survey of the case law the lawyer can verify passage by passage, without searching again.

Research

Ask

Research starts from your matter, not from keywords.

Our client, Alpha B.V., supplies packaging to Beta N.V. under a five-year contract. Beta stopped ordering in March and says clause 7 lets it end the contract at any time. Can Beta end it without paying for the remaining years?

Supply agreement Alpha–Beta.pdf PDF · 14 pages
NetherlandsCase lawHoge Raad2015–2026 Auto sources Send

  1. 01

    Describe the matter

    In plain words, the way you would brief a colleague: the parties, the dates, what the other side says.

  2. 02

    Attach the file

    The contract, the writ or the letter. A chat reads only the files you give it, next to the case law.

  3. 03

    Choose where to look

    The country, the kind of source, the court, the date. Or leave it on Auto, and jurispraxis.ai chooses from your question.

Answer · Netherlands · 2 sources

Every point rests on a quotation.

A general chatbot answers from memory. jurispraxis.ai searches the sources, reads the hits and answers with verbatim passages. Click a number, and the judgment opens on the exact passage. You do not have to trust it: you can check it.

How does the court interpret an unclear contract clause?

Not on a purely linguistic reading. What matters is the meaning the parties, in the circumstances, could reasonably attribute to the clause and what they could reasonably expect from each other 1. All circumstances of the case count, weighed against the standards of reasonableness and fairness 2.

  1. 1

    HR 13 March 1981 · Haviltex

    ECLI:NL:HR:1981:AG4158

    …kan niet worden beantwoord op grond van alleen maar een zuiver taalkundige uitleg van de bepalingen van dat contract. Voor de beantwoording van die vraag komt het immers aan op de zin die partijen in de gegeven omstandigheden over en weer redelijkerwijs aan deze bepalingen mochten toekennen en op hetgeen zij te dien aanzien redelijkerwijs van elkaar mochten verwachten.
    Open the passage ↗
  2. 2

    HR 20 February 2004 · DSM/Fox

    ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AO1427 , r.o. 4.5

    …bij de uitleg van een schriftelijk contract telkens van beslissende betekenis zijn alle omstandigheden van het concrete geval, gewaardeerd naar hetgeen de maatstaven van redelijkheid en billijkheid meebrengen.
    Open the passage ↗

Draft

Research is half the work. The other half is the document.

Your letterhead Amsterdam, 29 September 2026

Beta N.V., for the attention of the board

Notice of default

On behalf of Alpha B.V. we write about the supply agreement of 4 January 2024 (the “Agreement”).

Since March 2026 you have ordered no goods. Clause 7 does not let you end the Agreement at will: a clause is read by what the parties could reasonably expect of each other.1 We ask you to consider resuming the orders. We hold you in default and give you until 14 October 2026 to resume the orders.

Make it firmer and add a deadline.

Edition 3 · compared with 2 Download .docx
  1. 01

    Written beside the chat

    Ask for a notice of default, a statement of defence or a clause. The draft is written next to the chat, on the judgments the chat found.

  2. 02

    Your file as the form

    Name your own sample, and the draft keeps its headings, fixed wording and tables with the data of this matter. Or open your contract as the draft and change it.

  3. 03

    Changed by a request

    Select a paragraph and say what you want. Or edit it by hand, as in any editor.

  4. 04

    Every edition kept

    Compare any edition with the draft: deleted words struck through, new words marked. Restore an earlier one and lose nothing.

  5. 05

    To Word, in your firm’s style

    See the draft as Word will print it, then download the .docx on your own template — letterhead, headings, numbering — with tracked changes if you want them.

Skills

Every firm has its own way of working. Skills make it repeatable.

The skill of this chat

Auto When the work you ask for matches one of the skills, that skill applies to this answer.

Memorandum for the client

Question, rule, practice, conclusion — for a client who is not a lawyer, each term explained.

Files

The whole matter lives in one place.

  1. 01

    Folders by client and matter

    Upload PDF, DOCX and TXT files of up to 50 MB. Scans are read by text recognition.

  2. 02

    Private until you share

    Only you and the administrators see a file, until you open it to colleagues or attach it to a chat they share.

  3. 03

    Read only when you pick it

    A chat reads the files you give it, and no others. Auto never reaches your files.

Projects and team

Work together, on one balance.

  1. 01

    Projects

    Group the chats of one matter or one client, and choose who sees them.

  2. 02

    Members and roles

    Invite colleagues, give each a role, and share chats, projects and files.

  3. 03

    One balance

    The organisation shares its credits, and the usage journal shows what each member and each chat spent.

Confidentiality

Through all of it, confidentiality comes first.

  • The model sees labels. You see names.

    Before any text reaches a model, the names of people and companies, the identifiers, the phone numbers and the addresses that jurispraxis.ai recognises become labels. Each file shows what it hid, and you can correct it.

  • Stored in the EU

    Your files and your chats are kept in Amsterdam, in the European Union.

  • Never used for training

    We do not use your content to train AI models.

  • GDPR, in writing

    A data processing agreement and the full list of processors come with every firm subscription. Ask for both before you sign.

Jurisdictions

One engine. One jurisdiction at a time, done properly.

  • Netherlands

    open

    Case law · Legislation · Parliamentary history

    De Rechtspraak, the Basiswettenbestand and the parliamentary papers

  • France

    open

    Case law · Legislation

    Légifrance, Judilibre and the open data of the administrative courts

  • Poland

    open

    Case law · Legislation

    The courts’ own sites and the Sejm’s ELI service

  • European Union

    in progress

    Case law · Legislation

    Cellar, the repository behind EUR-Lex

  • Estonia

    in progress

    Case law · Legislation

    Riigi Teataja

  • Czechia

    in progress

    Case law · Legislation

    The Ministry of Justice, the courts’ own sites and e-Sbírka

  • Slovakia

    in progress

    Case law · Legislation

    The Ministry of Justice, the courts’ own sites and Slov-Lex

  • Slovenia

    in progress

    Case law · Legislation

    Sodna praksa, the Constitutional Court and the Official Gazette

  • Yours?

    Each jurisdiction gets its own sources, its own court vocabulary and its own practitioners.

    Tell us →

Public sources only, read where their publishers put them. No paid sources, no summaries written by someone else.

Frequently asked

What you want to know before you start.

Is this a chatbot?
No. A chatbot writes an answer from memory. jurispraxis.ai searches the sources first, reads the hits and answers with verbatim quotations, each with its citation. If something is not in the sources, it says so.
Which sources are searched?
The case law and the legislation of the Netherlands, France and Poland, and the Dutch parliamentary history — all public, all read from the open data of their publishers. Auto chooses from your question, or you pick the country, the collection and the filters yourself.
Can I add my own documents?
Yes. Upload PDF, DOCX or TXT files, scans included, and give them to a chat. The answer quotes your files and the case law and keeps the two apart. A chat reads only the files you pick.
Can it write the document too?
Yes. Ask for a letter, a claim or a contract clause, or name your own file as the form. The draft is written beside the chat, keeps every edition and downloads to Word in your firm’s style — with tracked changes, if you want them.
Does the model see my client’s names?
Not the ones it recognises. Before any text reaches a model, the names of people and companies, the identifiers, the phone numbers and the addresses that jurispraxis.ai recognises are replaced by labels. It can miss one, so the file view shows what was hidden, and you can correct it.
What does it cost?
The Start plan is free, to try the service on a real matter. Every plan gives the same app: the plans differ in their credits, in the price of an extra credit, and in how soon documents are processed.
Where is my data?
In the European Union, in Amsterdam. We do not use your content to train AI models. The data processing agreement is part of the terms of use.